this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19047 readers
627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Wtf nobody under 30 is going to vote for genocide. You lost them

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Got vote for Trump then. That'll really prove your point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're right! Not sure why you're getting downvoted. No one is going to vote for Trump who wants to melt Palestein

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You're right about Trump, but man it still sucks we can only vote for genocide or genocide slow burn. Not that anything is really slow burn at this point anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

Positive change takes time. It may take longer than you and I feel it should, but it happens.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It does suck. And it's ok to still vote based on the other parts of their platforms while continuing condemn genocide.

Engage with your elected officials, your local parties, and other grassroot efforts to bring more pressure to stopping war aid to Israel. The work to change politics and policy is done between elections.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

as aoc said when arguing why you should vote for biden the first time: you're not just voting for the person who already gives you everything you want. you're voting for the person you will argue against, criticize, protest and try to convince to do what you want. out of the two, who do you think is less likely to respond to protests? who's more likely to be open to dialogue, even if it's an adversarial one?

vote for Harris, then protest the fuck out of her positions you don't like. maybe with enough pressure you can force some change. with mango mussolini you have no chance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was a Bernie or buster in 2016 and I deeply regret it. Genocide is evil and we won't defeat it by not participating in the system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Participate. Vote West or Stein.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You didn't finish the second sentence...

"Vote West or Stein in a primary, or a general election with Rank Choice voting, otherwise you are actively contributing to the end of your Republic."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Or De LA Cruz (PSL).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I’m absolutely certain that you’re entirely wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the choices are genocide vs worse genocide. the choices suck, but they also shouldn't be hard

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Nah. I choose no genocide. Wtf is wrong with you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That isn't on the ballot, you don't understand first past the post do you?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't know about you, but I have candidates on my ballot who are opposed to the genocide

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

See that's the thing, most states don't. To the point where it is literally mathematically impossible for anyone besides Harris or Trump to win 270 EC votes.

One more thing that I'm sure has already been explained to you as nauseum.

Are you saying you don't understand basic arithmetic?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

You don't, because they have literally no chance of winning, you have the illusion of choice, and voting for them is a vote for maga genocide, you'd have to be very ignorant to not see that

https://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/10/us/2000-election-green-party-some-nader-supporters-seem-shaken-not-stirred-result.html

Don't make the same mistake

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your abstinence has high potentially to lead to election of the person who will objectively make the genocide worse, immediately undermining any moral stance you think you're making.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Depends on where they live tbh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not something you vote for, for that you need to take to the streets. But if you can't even be bothered to go that the 10 minutes to prevent the 'worse genocide' candidate taking power, I doubt you'll do that.

You don't need to be enthusiastic about Harris, she'll still support Israel. But Trump literally told Israel to 'finish the job'. Don't pretend they're the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

lol. Don't make such absurd assumptions. I've been Palestine to work for peace there. But, unlike you, I cast my vote to align with my values, activism, and work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

If this is in any way true, then you need to know that you are doing extensive damage to the future of the Palestinian people by convincing people to vote for anyone other than Harris (or to not vote at all).

I'm certain you know this, and it's been explained to you over and over and over (which is why I'm skeptical about your motives), so I'm not going to spell it out for you again.

But those people you allegedly worked with in Palestine will be dead in less than 6 months if Donald Trump wins.

In spite of all your whinging about "moral high ground," the practical, real life, reality when the dust settles, would be that you played a direct (and not inconsequential) role in their murders. No abstraction needed.

So if (when) you refuse to accept this reality, I have to assume that nothing you say is in good faith, and that what I just described is the outcome that you desire.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's great, I'm sure you're doing important work! But on the ballot in November there are three options:

  • Vote for a party that will continue the genocide.
  • Vote for a party that will accelerate and expand the genocide.
  • Don't vote.

Not voting helps boost republicans, low turnout always has. With the broken FPTP system, voting third party is equivalent to not voting.

The Palestinian cause will unfortunately not be won on the ballot anytime soon. I don't know about you, but for me, the moral satisfaction of not having voted for the Dems is not worth throwing immigrants, gay and trans people, reproductive rights, muslims and other marginalized groups under the bus. And with Project 2025 they've made it abundantly clear what's at stake.

I'm no US citizen, but if I was, I'd vote for Harris in a heartbeat. I'd curse the Dems name for the genocide they're enabling while doing so. But the lives of queer people and immigrants are more important than my moral satisfaction.

As it stands, I'll continue going to protests, supporting boycotts and as much as I can for Palestine over here, before I'll vote for a German party next year that won't free Palestine either. My government is sadly just as guilty as yours, and just like you I don't have a viable party with a strong anti-genocide stance. But I'll not cynically vacate the stage for fascists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

This is misinformation. There are candidates on the ballot that are opposed to the genocide.

Also, you literally have a Parliament in Germany and you're still choosing to fuck over the Palestinians?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Third party candidates are unfortunately not an option, and you know they aren’t. You and people like you are either arguing in bad faith, or you’re too disconnected with reality to know that you’re arguing in bad faith. By throwing your vote away with a third party, you are playing directly into the Republican’s playbook.

Congrats, you’re Trump’s tool.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To your edit, what would you have me do? I'm asking honestly. At the moment, I'm voting for the most left wing party on the ballot, but even they are lukewarm when it comes to Palestine. There is no party with a pro Palestine stance.

For the EU election there was, and I've voted for them. I hate electoralism as much as the next gal, but what can we do as individuals?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Even die partie is down with genocide? Pirate party? Greens? Labour?

Idk, I'm not German, but I feel like there's gotta be at least one party that represents anti-zionist Jews, especially with all the antisemitism going on there now

We have like 6 parties in the US opposed to funding the genocide. And we don't even have a Parliament.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Pirate party doesn't stand in federal elections, Greens are down with genocide, I don't know what you mean with Labour, but the SPD (social democrats) currently approved more weapons for Israel the day after they fired on UN blue helmets.

There is the Left party, whose general stance is peace and disarmament, but even they won't condemn Israel.

It's not great.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

And they will get less than a percent of votes and be forgotten. I don't like it either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Boycott. Divestment. Sanctions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

yes, obviously, but how does not voting for Harris accomplish that?