Technology
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
view the rest of the comments
I just would like to point out that you would not be using Windows 10 on or past Oct 2025. You have exactly one year to move on.
As soon as it reached end of life you know it will immediately be a huge target. Don't let personal preference put you at risk.
looks at self
How many other ways are my personal preferences putting me at risk?
One more year of dual-booting should be plenty of time to ween off the Windows teat.
They said that about XP too, but I never heard of anyone getting massively pwned after support stopped.
I hope you are joking...
I mean, not really? Unless someone holds onto a really bad exploit until after that point, it'll be no different than going increasingly behind on updates, there's no magic switch that will be thrown that makes it more vulnerable after EOL
Because MS is so good at quickly releasing quality patches for every vulnerability that it's not already a huge target?
Compared to not getting any patches at all? That doesn't seem like a good justification for staying on something EOL.
I stayed on XP until some game I wanted didn't work (by that time, 7 was out), I stayed on 7 until some game I wanted didn't work (by that time, 10 was out). Nothing bad happened to me. I'll take my chances. At least until I find the time to get into Linux, whenever that may be.