this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

memes

9956 readers
1274 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was making fun of this entire concept. If talking in public is allowed, it implies that everyone is comfortable with a person emitting a certain amount of noise. What form that noise takes is idiotic to divvy up and bitch about.

Explain to me how if you're annoyed by music playing, why is that any more valid than someone else being mad at talking? Or someone else for whistling? Singing? Phone ringing? Vibrating? Where are your arbitrary lines?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't be serious. Or you don't spend a lot of time in public.

Most people's conversations in public are fairly quiet. People often do get annoyed of people are having a screaming or otherwise disruptive conversation on the subway. Most humans don't find a quiet conversation that distracting though. Hearing half a conversation annoys most people- I think it's because the brain keeps trying to figure out what's happening.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/hearing-just-one-half-of-a-conversation-is-really-really-annoying-2657804/

It's not really """arbitrary lines""". The shared theme is "don't distract other people in public". Whistling fails this check. So does singing. As does a phone alarm going off. But also like most things that annoy or tolerate are arbitrary.

This is especially true if you need to hear announcements like what stop this is or that this train is going express.

Anyway, my current thinking is you're doing some sort of "bit" as a selfish child, or you just don't spend a lot of time in public.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So you would like legislation passed to outlaw street performers? If I'm a child for asking these questions, what does that make you, an angry old man yelling at kids? Maybe I'm just not as bothered by people living there lives as you are. I expect noise in public.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Street performers aren't the same as people watching videos on their phone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah, another arbitrary distinction. I'm sure glad that laws aren't up to your fickle sensibilities. Should we have a pre approved list of ring tones? Can we use music as ring tones?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't seem to understand how things or people work, so I don't think engaging with you further will be fruitful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Lol, and you don't know how logic works. You can't even articulate what you want changed in the status quo in a consistent and sensible manner. I certainly know how things work, which is why I can point out how this entire argument about noise in public is entirely full of holes and nonsense. Life is noisy, deal with it. Or get some ear plugs. And then whine about it on the Internet.