politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Allowed access to the voting system as in to investigate or as in to tamper? One is hopefully unnecessary but harmless and one is obviously worthy of prison time, in my opinion.
She was not authorised to allow access, whatever the reason. You don’t get to break the law just because you think you have a reason.
Regardless, it was to tamper (or to find a way to tamper, more specifically).
I'm not on board with the Law = Morality argument and I doubt you are.
Gandhi? Rosa Parks? MLK? Would you tell them they shouldn't have broken the law just because they think they have a reason?
Get a grip. It’s absolutely crazy to compare Tina Peters to MLK Jr., Rosa Parks, or Gandhi. These people fought against deep systemic injustice, risking their lives for civil rights and freedom. Peters’ actions, spreading lies tied to election denial and abuse of power, don’t come close to that level of sacrifice or historical importance. Trying to equate the two is a huge stretch and undermines the legacy of true leaders who changed the world for the better.
I'm not making the point that this person is as virtuous as any of the three that I named. I'm making the point that Law and Morality are not the same thing. Either you don't understand that or you do understand it and facing your crummy point earlier is making you upset.
Either way, find someone else to talk to because we're done here.
What Tina Peters did is clearly immoral. She tampered with voting equipment and spread lies about election fraud, which directly undermines trust in democracy. I don’t care if she thought she was doing the right thing. Breaking laws meant to protect elections is not just wrong, it’s dangerous.
I agree with this comment, but it wasn't the basis of your earlier comment. You're accidentally or intentionally moving the goal posts because you want to fight and you want to be right at any cost.
From what I gathered in the article, she wasn’t allowed access. She stole someone else’s access card to get in. So, worthy of prison time absolutely.
Yeah I'm very much against that but not nearly as against the idea of transparency in voting.
The obvious drawback being it could affect the anonymity of voting, which is an essential cornerstone to healthy democracies.
What the fuck are you talking about with this irrelevant bullshit?
Do you think I'm inclined to answer your question when you ask it like that?
Your opinion is bad and you should feel bad.
You don't think she deserves prison? Why?
Your use of the word "you're" is bad and you should feel bad.
Edit: We all know what your edit was. Own it.
It is a shame that the article doesn't have those details.
Oh wait, it does!
There is no reason for this kind of access except to tamper, because the system is formally audited by people who don't have to sneak in through illegal access.
Thanks for summing it up for me and no thanks for the hostility! Reminds me of Reddit, so I feel right at home.
Yep, she should be in prison.
I'm sick of people trying to pretend like the people trying to interfere with elections would have some kind of non-malicious intent.
Also I was being snarky, not hostile. Words mean things.
I'm sick of people jumping down each other's throats when someone asks about something they don't know about.
So I guess we're both sick of each other. 🖕
Why are you still talking to me? Is it because you're lying about being sick of people like me and it's really that you enjoy being rude?
Going to have to figure out how to block people on lemmy now. May as well learn how on day 2, but it's a bit sooner than I expected.
I'm surprised you managed to figure out how to make a Lemmy account considering you can't even tell when more than one person responds to you. And acting all wounded when you didn't bother to RTFA and someone is kind enough to spoon feed you anyway is very reddit of you.
I've never spoken to you in my life
I am now suspecting that you are a russian NPC or a clueless boomer, maybe both. Bless you either way
Unfortunately the answer is usually Russian NPC