this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
83 points (96.6% liked)

RetroGaming

19568 readers
714 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I thought the halo ce was generally very well received. Is the hate for it a lemmy generation thing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is and it’s certainly a better game than HL.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not hard to be honest, time wasn't kind to HL 1.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It was revolutionary and changed a lot in game design on a significant number of fronts. It just aged poorly as others iterated and replaced its aspects. Halo has aged well mainly because (like most Bungie titles) it still feels like a modern title due to how tight, responsive, smooth, and intuitive the player’s interaction with the world is — mainly the controls and weapons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I've been playing for the first time a while back. It's neat, but I think the primary reason people love it so much is that it's the first popular console FPS that didn't control horribly and split screen co-op. On it's own it's just a decent shooter that no longer feels special.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Alotta half-life and older shooter fans blame the modern console shooter style on halo.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

I thought the halo ce was generally very well received.

So was a whole bunch of other FPS tripe that glorified USian militarism.