this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
301 points (96.9% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3487 readers
38 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right, but that's exactly my point, it likely wouldn't just be one flat color. If you scale it by population density you get a map displaying the average distance between kids and parents compared to the average distance between any two people which I would expect to be 1. non-uniform and 2. more meaningful than raw kid-parent distance. The current map is useful and accurate, but I think the more interesting contributing factors are being drowned out by raw population density. Deciding what factors to control for (ie. pop. density, wealth level, etc.) results in a different meaningful outcome and is very important to consider when making conclusions based on the map. The image's scale is probably too granular to do this analysis but if the raw data is finer-grained I would love to see a density-controlled version.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right, but that’s exactly my point, it likely wouldn’t just be one flat color. If you scale it by population density you get a map displaying the average distance between kids and parents compared to the average distance between any two people which I would expect to be 1. non-uniform...

My point was that I expect exactly the opposite: that the average distance between kids and parents is pretty much exactly proportional to the average distance between any two people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This is why we need the map! I'm curious which prediction would be accurate.