this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
301 points (96.9% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3487 readers
38 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The median distance without anything else is worthless. The median only represents the "typical American" if we're working with some kind of bell curve, which can't be true since a sizable chunk of people still lives with their parents. For all I know 49% of people could be living with their parents and another 49% could have moved far away - the median still only shows a data point from the remaining 2% of people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the data is normally distributed (as in bell shaped), the mean and median will be the same. The problem is that the data is probably very skewed, so the median is probably a better representation of the central tendency than the mean. Also, it's incorrect to say it only represents 2% of people; it's more that every person is only represented by their position in the set. Quintiles, quartiles, and percentiles work the same way. I like to think of it as everyone being a single vote, unweighted by value.

That said, if you wanted another acceptable alternative, you can also remove all outliers and likely return the curve back to normal. The problem there is you'd probably be removing every immigrant, so you wouldn't be representing all Americans. Pros and cons, but given medians are almost only used to describe data and not analyze it, since it's not compatable with a lot of statistics. A real analyst would probably just dummy code immigration in a regression and provide coefficients for both groups, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That said, if you wanted another acceptable alternative, you can also remove all outliers and likely return the curve back to normal.

I'm not sure I would call that "acceptable." I would be more likely to call it "destroying the interesting features of the data."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Acceptable in the statistical sense. Normality is required by a lot of statistical tests, so it's done a lot. There are better ways to do it without losing important insights though, hence what I said later in that paragraph.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

This "anything else" usually is the variance or standard deviation, but I doubt anyone without education in statistics can grasp what they mean.