this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
527 points (97.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
2 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

waypipe exists, but it's still not perfect.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Never heard about this. Thx.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Neither was X11 so it's in good company

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Btw. when we get wayland ~~forwarding over Network~~?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

/c/foundthenvidiauser

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Exactly. We won’t. We’ll get specialized video stream over network. I’m not happy about this regression. I understand that was a willing sacrifice to achieve better local performance, but I’m not sure it was worth it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Their reasoning was that X11 network transparency had been broken for quite some time. If you tried running chrome, most games, or anything with modern hardware acceleration over X11 forwarding, they wouldn't work.

So, IMHO waypipe is actually an improvement in terms of compatibility, rather than a regression.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

You always had the option to send frames over the net using VNC and such. But for many use cases, X over SSH was absolutely fantastic.

I remember using it on a very basic DSL connection to work remotely back in 2005, and it was almost like running local. You don’t get anywhere near the same performance with VNC or RDP.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s more about security if I recall correctly

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How so? Is there a way for malicious code to start injecting itself into calls to 127.0.0.1?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I am not an expert myself, but I think there are some recourses about that in the internet

Or, this file on x.org:

“But the X protocol is still unsecure by design…”

https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2014/XDC2014DodierPeresSecurity/xorg-talk.pdf

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, to send it naked over the wire would be nuts, which is why everybody uses SSH. But unless there’s insecurity within the computer, that’s a moot point.