this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
445 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

31372 readers
47 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I had no idea this issue had been identified. While I find this tool very useful, the project is seeming rather questionable to me now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think they'd call up devs who left them just to ask if they happen to know about a random file?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think they’d call up devs who left them just to ask if they happen to know about a random file?

I mean, that’s what op said happened. Literally with the verbiage of “file we found” and not “file you committed”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I did mean random devs, not the dev they tracked down that made the change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Right, I based it on an estimate on the size of the company and how many devs they’ve had. But if a 7MB file doubled their build size and nobody noticed for 5 years, it likely wasn’t code reviewed or committed and rather just added somewhere, It’d be my guess that it’s a pretty small team, and if they’re willing to call anyone at this point anyway as they only have a few devs, and not just remove the file, they’re probably unsure on if it serves any sort of point, which usually would be clear in a commit or PR