this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
1309 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

4342 readers
978 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm saying it doesnt rise to the level of determining if someone is a good or bad person. Besides the fact that noone is good or bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Who's Noone, and what makes them good or bad?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let me put it another way:
They fail the vibe check
It's a red flag

Bad vibes and red flags don't mean for sure someone is a bad person, they're a call to be alert and suspicious.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That only applies if its someone in your social circle. You can follow up with them and ask why, learn about their struggles or stance on it.

With strangers you have none of that, just little glimpses into their life for a few seconds as they cross yours. When we are out in public it is very important to make quick judgments for safety, but this often is confused with moral judgment.

There are very few people in each persons social circle that they know well enough to judge morally. Strangers aren't close enough by a long shot.

With all this considered, I have to conclude its best to always give strangers the benefit of the doubt when personal safety isnt involved.

I'm concerned this post is showing people are coming to the opposite conclusion, that we now have this great new way to judge strangers we shouldnt be judging to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For complete strangers who you never see again, it doesn't matter if you judge them or not, you'll never see them again.

It's useful on aggregate to tell the general attitude of an area to set expectations for interacting with strangers.

But mostly what people are talking about is when you're getting to know someone. If you find out an acquaintance or romantic prospect does/doesn't then it's one (of many) indicators you can gather to build a model of them.

Remember, this isn't deep. This is intentionally super simple. There is no "struggle" involved that wouldn't be immediately apparent. There is very little room for nuance because there is very little to be nuanced about.

This is "given the chance, will this person spend a trivial amount of effort to make someone's life easier, if there is no personal gain?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

First, what absolute savage would take a new acquaintance or romantic interest grocery shopping and make a show out of leaving the cart? Thats absolutely a red flag.

Second, you are right that with strangers it won't matter if you judge them, but thats only true from their perspective. The way you think and carry on affects how you feel, its not a good idea to waste energy judging people in that way. It affects how you perceive and interact with the world essentially.