28
Hitech seems to be arguing that the FIA has no authority to accept/reject entries based on commercial factors, but rather only based on safety and regulation factors.
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)
Formula 1
9013 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
| Location | Date |
|---|---|
| πΊπΈ United States | 18-20 Oct |
| π²π½ Mexico | 25-27 Oct |
| π§π· Brazil | 01-03 Nov |
| πΊπΈ United States | 21-23 Nov |
| πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
| π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wouldn't this also set a huge precedent for Andretti?
They might certainly try to use the same principle against FOM, but I think FOM's analysis is only on the commercial side, so it could be less useful. I have always thought that their best course of action would be using anti-competition arguments, especially because the EU is very strict about it. But maybe they also know that barging in using their lawyers would have long-lasting consequences in a sport where having friends is pretty important.
FOM/Liberty is not an EU company, but they are being investigated over non-compete/monopoly by the American DOJ I believe.
FOM is located in the UK, so neither EU nor US. Liberty who owns FOM is a US company afaik.
Liberty being US based seems to be sufficient for the Justice Department to at least take the case. ^[1]