this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
141 points (98.6% liked)
Open Source
31020 readers
624 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A keyboard with swipe typing, multilingual autocorrect and speech to text support that actually works.
Other than that, my only proprietary apps are from commercial services I use and pay for (banking, Spotify, Carsharing and public transport). I'd love for them to become open source, but it's probably not ever gonna happen, cause they rely on verifying my identity.
I've had a good experience with HeliBoard
Japanese has been an open issue for months now, so it's a nope from me.
X2. I don't like it, but I still use that libswype Google blob to get swipe-writing. I wish they could produce their own in the future.
I went with FUTO Keyboard. It's the only keyboard that ticks all my boxes to replace GBoard so far.
I wish the swiping predictions were a bit better though.
FUTO keyboard is proprietary.
It is not. FUTO calls it "source first" which just means "open source but with rules against bad actors". Certainly far from proprietary.
It is not open source, because it does not meet the definition of open source.
If the license doesn't meet the OSD and does not protect four freedoms, then it is not open-source.
It is by FUTO's definition.
Jokes aside, I find that attitude not very healthy. Whether you want to call it open source or not, as I said, it's far from proprietary, and certainly more than just source available. Dismissing it for that reason is quite unreasonable.
FUTO changing the definition of open source to suit their business model is like that time US Congress decided that pizza was a vegetable because it has tomato sauce.
FUTO's EULA may superficially resemble a true free software license (and may be good enough for you, personally) but it fundamentally undermines core tenets of the free software movement in order to preserve their business interests. All pseudo-FOSS licenses (whether of the "ethical" or the "business" variety) do this, because they prioritize the interests of the rightsholder above those of the community and the user. If important free software projects like Linux and Firefox were released under this license the free software world as we know it would not be possible.
As proprietary licenses go, it's certainly far from the worst.
That was silly yeah because a Tomato is a fruit not a vegetable lol
Calling a source-available license "not proprietary", this is what not very healthy.
"Source-first" or "fair code" are just a fancy ways to say "proprietary".
Does the futo keyboard allow you to paste content yet?
I briefly used it but found the lack of content pasting too much of a hindrabce.
Has options for pasting, and even a clipboard history feature? Although have not enabled that or tested it.
By pasting content, I meant pasting images. I've just checked it and it doesn't do it yet. I often will take a screenshot but only copy the image because saving it pointless.
Have you tried openboard? Admittedly it doesn't the text to soeech
yes, tried it.
HeliBoard in combination with FUTO Voice Input is recommended. Unfortunately, the word prediction isn't too good.
@Kasupke are we recommending proprietary software here in the open-source lemmy community?