Ask Android

2180 readers

4 users here now

A place to ask your questions and seek help related to your Android device and the Android ecosystem.

Whether you're looking for app recommendations, phone buying advice, or want to explore rooting and tutorials, this is the place for you!

Rules

Be descriptive: Help us help you by providing as many details as you can.
Be patient: You're getting free help from Internet strangers, so you may have to wait for an answer.
Be helpful: If someone asks you for more information, tell us what you can. If someone asks you for a screenshot, please provide one!
Be nice: Treat others with respect, even if you don't agree with their advice. Accordingly, you should expect others to be nice to you as well. Report intentionally rude answers.
No piracy: Sharing or discussing pirated content is strictly prohibited. Do not ask others for a paid app or about how to acquire one.
No affiliate/marketing links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.
No URL shorteners: These can hide the true location of the page and lead people to malicious places.
No lockscreen bypasses: Please do not comment, link, or assist with bypassing lock screens or factory reset protection.
No cross-posting: Please take the time to make a proper post instead of cross-posting.

Other Communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you have any critiques of Pixel 9 Gemini's privacy? (security.googleblog.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm considering stock pixel 9, but I was wondering if anyone had specific critiques of Gemini's privacy.

I use LLM bots frequently, but am a bit hesitant to let one take over my phone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

We’ve always safeguarded your data with an integrated stack of world-class secure infrastructure and technology, delivering end-to-end protection in a way that only Google can

This is weaselly even by marketing standards. Most of Google's services are still not end-to-end encrypted, and none of them were until recently. Oh, but they said "end-to-end protection", which means absolutely nothing, so I guess it's not technically a bald-faced lie.

Anyway, aside from their attempt to rewrite history, it sounds a lot like Apple's promise with their secure and verifiable AI servers. Google's blog post references Project Oak, which I'm not intimately familiar with.

I'm still skeptical of these supposedly-private cloud platforms, but I have a lot of reading to do if I want to develop an informed opinion.