this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
345 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

10842 readers
2270 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 75 points 2 months ago (1 children)

shakes fist in anger ๐’‚๐’€€๐’ˆพ๐’ข๐’…•

[โ€“] [email protected] 80 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I'm flipping between "why is there cuneiform Unicode" and "of course there's cuneiform Unicode" much more rapidly than I really expected

[โ€“] [email protected] 61 points 2 months ago (2 children)

cuneiform isnt even that weird,
check out the multiocular O ๊™ฎ
this was only used once in a single cyrillic manuscript to spell "many-eyed seraphim"

[โ€“] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

> Furries in the audience respond: "OwO neat sona~!

OK BE AT LEAST A LITTLE AFRAID

[โ€“] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Their fly-sona.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Aaahhhhh!

I said be not afraid! Geez!

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the version of it most apps use doesn't even have enough eyes. The original text (and the updated since Unicode) has 10-eyed O, while most places display 7. Old Cyrillic texts are pretty wild.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

It's kind of infuriating that with trouble having been taken defining this single use character, people don't bother to render it correctly.

[โ€“] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

๐“‚ธ ๐“‚น ๐“‚บ there are hieroglyphs too, and these appear often enough to be included.

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

I can't imagine why or how they would be used very often. /s

[โ€“] emptyother 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Shame I can only see squares there. I wonder why. I can see wikipedia's. Does this work? Two hieroglyphs: ๐“‚€๐“€€

Edit: It does, I can read those in my own comment.

Edit 2: Windows issue? I can see them on Android/sync for lemmy.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

I can see both your and the original hieroglyphics just fine on my phone using Firefox, and on windows with the same.

Odd thing is, my wife sometimes gets MY emoji and non-standard text as squares, and we have the exact same phone. The only difference between us is she uses the default keyboard.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Might not have the full code block implemented.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, most dead scripts have Unicode, specifically because how the hell would you write academic papers about them in this day and age otherwise? Even old Irish Ogham:

แš…แš–แš™แš—

The line is a convention, because ogham was originally written on the corner of a stone stela.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

แš›แš‘แšŒแš†แšแš‹แš€แš”แš„แš€แšแšƒแš“แš„แš‘แš‹แš“แšœ

Ogham is awesome

I've used it for cryptic languages in TTRPGs before, alongside a few other runic scripts like แ›–แ›šแ›žแ›–แšฑแ›ซแš แšขแšฆ๏ธแšจแšฑแšฒ.

My favorite is Gallifreyan, which doesn't have unicode, is far too niche and homebrewed to have unicode, and how the hell would unicode even work?

Gallifreyan

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

For anyone else stumbling about this revelation: It very well wouldn't be Unicode otherwise now, would it?

There's a reason linguists and computer scientists sometimes get mental breakdowns over emoji because the know that those same emoji were on the same agenda taking up actual time as discussions about which ancient language or newly discovered grapheme/symbol/lexicogram/whatever should be added first/next. (Not saying emoji aren't also tremendously important/good/what ever additions!!)