this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
33 points (97.1% liked)

New Democratic Party

592 readers
3 users here now

For those that seek a future that brings together the best of the insights and objectives of people who, within the social democratic and democratic socialist traditions, have worked through farmer, labour, co-operative, feminist, human rights and environmental movements, and with First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples, to build a more just, equal, and sustainable Canada within a global community dedicated to the same goals.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wish there was more focus on the reasons why arbitration had to be forced. Our rail and its workers, and therefore our entire economy, is held hostage by two (two!!) companies. I think it's high time they were split up.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Break them up to encourage competition and electrification.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It could be public but then that’s one company holding it up

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We don’t allow freight and logistics companies to own highways, so we do we still let them own track?

The public should own the tracks. Rail companies should be freed to focus on competing for cargo and passengers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes but that’s a separate issue and exists to keep truckers employed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What’s your logic for treating it separately? The tracks and roads both serve as infrastructure to move people and goods around, yet the public owns only roads.

We could keep more train conductors employed too if we had a fairer access system for tracks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The shipping would still be controlled by a duopoly