this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
284 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

1221 readers
1 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

CEO Carl Pei says remote work “is not compatible” with the company.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I really liked the work Nothing was doing, what a bummer. "this is a company for grown ups" my ass, how condescending.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What work? They are just regular phones, with a bit more ego centric bs marketing showered over.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah their hardware was overpriced and I couldn't find any justification for their prices being higher than "well but we're independent and our hardware is aesthetically pleasing"

Like... I get why Teracube and Fairphone are expensive for their specs. But Nothing gave me cryptobro vibes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Fairphone are expensive for their specs

ye, and its a price I gladly paid for my fairphone 5. I love that thing :D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The thing is... Fair phone is how expensive all phones their capability should be. Its just that most phones are greed machines produced via the exploitation of labor

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The design and interface mostly. Nothing UI is actually pleasurable to use, but I'm a fan of minimalism.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair, but isn't it just pretty much just stock android? I guess it's nice to have another option out there for (almost) stock though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Stock android doesn't really exist. It barely works and is missing essential features like working Bluetooth audio. It's intended as a starting point for companies to build their own experience on top of, if any company released a phone running anywhere near stock android they would be laughed out of existence. Linus Tech tips did a pretty good overview of what stock android is a few days ago https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-hlRB2izres

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but that's not really what people mean when they talk about "stock android". Generally it means a version you would find on a Pixel or Xperia phone, the bare minimum basically without complete overhauls like OneUI etc.

But you already knew that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That version doesn't exist is what I'm saying. The manufacturers have to put in significant work to get it to that point. And along the way they have to choose to make it similar to pixel/what people expect "stock" android to look like, instead of putting their own flair on it. My point is that it takes just as much work to make an android skin that feels "stock" as to make one that doesn't. You can't dismiss their version of Android as being "stock" because that doesn't exist.