this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
1524 points (98.5% liked)
People Twitter
5383 readers
892 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can also list only positive things about a thing being argued for, while omitting any of its consequences.
What exactly are the consequences in this case?
A lot of focus and money spent on renewables that could have been spent elsewhere, like on infrastructure or welfare. Wind and solar farms take up a lot of space that could be used for other things like nature. I'm not saying renewables are bad, but it's always a compromise on where to spend resources.
Wind turbines do not take up much space, especially off shore ones.
Solar panels can easily go over areas we aren’t even using like roofs and non arable land.
unless we became a global leader in clean energy and our economy grew accordingly. then we would have more money for other things too.
Also i would argue clean renewable energy is a form of welfare since it would lead to better health for everyone (thus less healthcare costs), and cheaper energy as well.
Especially in the long run. I expect it to be unlimited in the way internet plans are, where you just pay a monthly fee and can use as much as you need (within reason).