this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
243 points (99.6% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2527 readers
1 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Lol!

And super dense ~~helium~~ hydrogen!

(The size of the Hindenburg isn't relative to how much it could lift it was relative to the amount of ~~helium~~ hydrogen gas required to lift things.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

You are correct sir.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can't tell if the parenthetical is sarcasm or just genuinely wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You need a certain amount of hydrogen to create lift.

The size of the Hindenburg would be relative to the amount of hydrogen needed to create such a lift.

Therefore, the size of the Hindenburg isn't relative to how much it can lift. The amount of hydrogen is the only thing that is relative.

If you wanted to gain the same amount of lifting power in a smaller package, you would have to make the hydrogen denser which would turn it into a completely different element in and of itself which is why the statement in the post is funny and mine numbingly stupid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I still can't tell if you're being intentionally sarcastic or if you genuinely don't know how aerostatics work.