Privacy

32107 readers

527 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

682

Google pulls the plug on uBlock Origin, leaving over 30 million Chrome users susceptible to intrusive ads (www.windowscentral.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

197 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google's campaign against ad blockers across its services just got more aggressive. According to a report by PC World, the company has made some alterations to its extension support on Google Chrome.

Google Chrome recently changed its extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the new Manifest V3 framework. The browser policy changes will impact one of the most popular adblockers (arguably), uBlock Origin.

The transition to the Manifest V3 framework means extensions like uBlock Origin can't use remotely hosted code. According to Google, it "presents security risks by allowing unreviewed code to be executed in extensions." The new policy changes will only allow an extension to execute JavaScript as part of its package.

Over 30 million Google Chrome users use uBlock Origin, but the tool will be automatically disabled soon via an update. Google will let users enable the feature via the settings for a limited period before it's completely scrapped. From this point, users will be forced to switch to another browser or choose another ad blocker.

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A CEO is a needed possition

Ha! Good one...

oh wait. You're serious...

How is a ceo needed? They do no work. Their entire job is to rake in cash from workers.

All a ceo needs is a guillotine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok, granted that the CEO concept is not the only way to lead a company.

But you do need a leader, someone who can make decisions for the company, someone to make everyday decisions that are not fun, but needed to make the company work.

We can absolutely argue about their compensation, but thst is another argument alltogether.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Here's a short animated Ted Talk about co-ops without CEO's. Decisions can be decided by the workers, I think there's some disconnect on what you're imagining a CEO is. If you're needing to make decisions everyday for the company to work.... well you're looking at something like Twitter which isn't a stable company in a lot of ways. The video goes on to explain how co-ops operate and perform successfully through the centuries and a good starting point if you haven't been introduced to the business model before.

Managers or "presidents" do exist, but the big difference is their role is to implement the decisions made by the group and does away with the usual power structure that influences and hurts the workers (usually through wage theft like the record bonuses CEO's collect while making decisions for the share holders, not the consumers or employees).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Right.

And a football team doesn't need a quarterback.

🤦🏼‍♂️

Yes, many of them are assholes, doesn't change the need for the leadership.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

ceos are not equivalent to quarterbacks.

the ceo is equivalent of the team owner. he makes the money and not much else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

CEO =/= business owner

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

i know, but its closer in equivalence