this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
509 points (92.5% liked)

News

23014 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Headline slightly sensationalised compared to article content. But he did say he’d go to Venezuela if he loses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But he did say he’d go to Venezuela if he loses.

He did not.

As I explained earlier today, he was commenting about crime decreasing around the world and, if Kamala were elected, it would be safer to meet the person he was speaking with in Venezuela than in the United States.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

"If something happens with this election, which would be a horror show, we'll meet the next time in Venezuela, because it'll be a far safer place to meet than our country," Trump said to Musk.

#"OK, so we'll go. You and I will go, and we'll have a meeting and dinner in Venezuela."

Cut this shit out, dude. He said it.

[–] Corgisocks 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't sound like fleeing, sounds they are are going to have dinner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

*in another country *if he loses the election

That's fleeing.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know how you've twisted your brain in a fashion that makes apples look like pencils.

You and the media are misquoting him as saying he is going to flee the country, possibly to avoid criminal prosecution.

He is literally saying it would be safer to have a meeting in another country due to decreased criminal activity and the threat of a Harris presidency.

There's a valid conversation to have around his statement. We could be discussing the crime rates in the US compared to Venezuela and the rest of the world. We could be looking at Harris' record as a prosecutor and her political agenda to this point. We could easily be debunking what he's saying to pile on more evidence that he's a liar. Instead, the public wants to go on and on about something he actually never said or even hinted at.

Moreover, what my concern here is, the public's ability to read comprehensively is deteriorating at a rapid pace. People are disinterested in taking the time to read an article and obtain true facts in preference of engaging with others over their feelings.

Having genuine dialog with others is more about listening than it is interrupting them and spewing your ideas. Everyone's reading a headline and reacting without taking the time to listen to the story, digest its meaning, consider other factors and context, then responding in a meaningful, relevant manner.

I'm personally observing a world that's becoming less interested in having real relationships. People are struggling to interact with others in real life. Ragebait is just one value in a larger more complex experience that's changing our relationships and our reality.

There's a lot of noise in our lives today. Most of it serves as a distraction. It's the constant churning of the "news" and the endless instant streaming of "content" and the pings and buzzing of our devices. If it hasn't already, this noise is becoming an addiction. Without noise, we'd be faced with calmness and focused attention.

Trump is noise. It's noise crated by him and his brand and the media organizations and influencers pining for your attention and engagement. This story is a fabrication. The story about him slurring during the interview is a misleading observation. It's a money maker for content creators because we need noise. Musk saying there was a DDOS attack is a lie and a distraction. It's the noises he's injecting into the zeitgeist to pull our attention away from something else.

We all need to be better at reading comprehension and listening. Take a moment to understand what it is you're commenting on before you just become more noise and a cookie jar for advertisers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You claimed he never made plans to leave the country, so I posted his exact quote where he makes plans to leave the country and now you're claiming I'm misquoting him?

He's a convicted felon who has yet to be sentenced making plans to leave the country. Why didn't you mention that in your list of other factors and context we could be talking about?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Your quote was taken out of context. If you listen to the segment I'm commenting on here, it's very apparent he's not speaking about "leaving the country" but about crime rates. And as I said in the other thread, I'm only commenting on the short clip that I'm hearing. There may in fact be more context that pushes his words one way or another.

... and again I told you their crime rates all over the world are going way down which makes sense. Cause actually, and next time what we'll do, if something happens with this election, which would be a horror show, we'll meet the next time in Venezuela cause it'll be a far safer place to meet than our country. Ok so we'll go, you and I will go and we'll have a meeting and dinner in Venezuela, because that's what's happening...

So yes, I'll concede he is making plans to leave the country to have a meeting and dinner date in another country. If's that's the semantics you want to focus on, I'll concede. The reason for him leaving the country, in the context of this conversation and the larger point he's trying to make, is about safety and crime.

What I would infer from this is he's pushing a false narrative about the "radical left's agenda" to allow crime rates to go uncontrolled. I also wouldn't take it as fact that he intends to go to Venezuela nor that he truly believes Venezuela is safer than the US. He's being hyperbolic using a hypothetical. Which is totally on brand for him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You admit he's a liar, and that he's making plans on leaving the country so why trust him when he says WHY he says he's making those plans? Again, he's a convicted felon who has yet to be sentenced. For being a stickler on 'context', you seem to be ignoring that part.

Also, are you going to edit your initial comment to admit that he did make plans to leave the country now that you conceded he did?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's evident that your mind is made up. You've chosen to reject reality in favor of your hopes and your feelings. Something must be true because you want it to be true. While I also want it to be true, I prioritize reality to inform my observations.

It's painful to observe our comprehension of reality melting away for the benefit of the media and corporations and fascist-wannabes. They know people just see and feel what they want as long as it generates something other than nothing. I genuinely hope you'll find a way to disconnect yourself from the twisted reality you subscribe to.

Actually, I had considered editing my comment to reflect the fact that he did not make plans to leave. It's a hypothetical situation based on something that hasn't happened. How you're unable to discern that is too much for my mind to handle right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

So yes, I’ll concede he is making plans to leave the country

I had considered editing my comment to reflect the fact that he did not make plans to leave.

You don't get to have it both ways. How you're unable to discern that is too much for my brain. Have a good day.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago

Underrated comment