this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
96 points (98.0% liked)
Economics
444 readers
1 users here now
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've tried taking public transport in my dense area with a developed network. It was slower AND more expensive than driving myself. I understand one or the other but not both worse options.
I feel like your public transit agency has to be ripping people off for it to be more expensive than driving. Renting a parking spot cost us almost half of the unlimited transit pass, and repairing my car's AC could have paid for close to a year of passes. Not to mention gas and other routine maintenance (I would change my own oil but it's inaccessible without getting underneath, and my apartment complex has a rule against "repairs" in the parking lot which I'm sure lifting my car would count as).
Being slower is just par for the course in the US though so that doesn't surprise me.
Where is that?
In the US, your car insurance alone will far exceed the cost of a daily/weekly/monthly transit pass so I find that extremely hard to believe. For instance, in Dallas, a daily transit pass is $6 (there are cheaper passes for monthly or even yearly time frames), and in Houston a daily pass is $3.
I neglected to count my insurance as part of it since I wouldn't be able to get rid of my car entirely anyway
*Maybe in Texas regarding insurance being more than transit. When I lived there my car insurance was $160/no because of all the uninsured, dangerous drivers. And by those I mean Americans to be clear. I moved north and I'm paying $55/mo for insurance..