-12
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
-12 points (35.7% liked)
Firefox
4217 readers
37 users here now
A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's fine to criticize Mozilla for taking money from Google, but you would also have to accept that Firefox wouldn't exist without it. Google revenue is something like 80% of the revenue Mozilla receives in a year.
In fact it may be that Google is no longer allowed to pay Mozilla to make Google the default search engine on Firefox. If this is the case you will get to see how well they do without that money.
To be clear, I don't like that Mozilla is taking this money either, but the only way they're going to be able to stay afloat is by taking money from someone. Unless everyone who uses Firefox donates regularly to Mozilla.
I hope whatever remedies the court decides upon to weaken Google's monopoly end up helping Firefox, otherwise it's just making Google a bigger monopoly. But this case was mostly about search, and I don't really trust the Justice Department or the courts to be this keenly aware of the state of web browsers.