196

16412 readers

1209 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

350

Judge Jabberwocky Rule (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Boneless wings are typically breast meat, like tenders and nuggets, cut into shapes that resemble wings.

https://www.webstaurantstore.com/blog/4316/what-are-boneless-wings.html

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So they really are just chicken nuggets for adults then...
Seriously, what the fuck are you guys doing over there if "boneless wings" are neither boneless nor wings?!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

To be fair, calling them "wings" was to my knowledge more about linking them to how chicken wings as a dish were prepared and presented than a statement on where the meat came from on the bird.

I don't know much about this case in particular but it fits into a long pattern of activist conservative judges basically legislating from the bench to protect business interests. So it's unsurprising that one of them would basically say "no one actually believes the wing part, so there's no reason for them to believe the boneless part either, and therefore there's no liability if there are bones in the product."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

You say "over there" but this is an Ohio ruling. That'd be like judging all of Europe for Belarusian rulings.