Middle East and North Africa

78 readers

6 users here now

Rules:

Rule 0. Comments must be on topic, off topic comments lead to immediate ban. Off topic comments are any comments that will lead to diverging from the post's topic. If you want to discuss something post about it.

Rule 1. No refutation without a source. Any bias against MENA sources could lead to a ban if not backed with evidence. The burden of proof is on you.

Rule 2. This community is first and foremost for people from the region. Foreigners trying to justify military intervention or genocide are not welcomed.

Breaking of these rules may result in a 500-3000 day ban.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If you told me in 2001 that the US will spend $2.4 trillion and 20 years to replace the Taliban with the Taliban I would have thought you were crazy. (lemm.ee)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Yet that's exactly what happened and the US public are not only okay with it, but eager to repeat it again.

So now I am taking bets on how much time and money do you think the US will lose in the Middle East to achieve nothing except looking foolish in the eyes of the world.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

True. This is something that I need to work on and improve. I am aware of it but don't know how to mitigate it.

To me it looks like my response is well cited with numbers and quotes, but I know that it comes across as abrasive and I don't know where this failure is happening.

Thank you for the honest feedback.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I might’ve been unfair in my reply but I also think we both have different criteria for what we think winning and losing looks like. The numbers you cited, whether true or not, don’t really mean much in this situation. 3 $30m drones is literally nothing compared to the full military budget. The other numbers, and I might be wrong, were already budgeted for so either way, the US was going to spend that money.

So to me, looking at just the costs doesn’t really convince me either way. Now if we look at the live situation, it’s basically ‘the west’ attempting to shoot down the Houthi attacks. More of a defensive strategy in my eyes.

Just as an example, look back at that swarm Iran sent at Israel. Do you really think the US is incapable of doing the same bombardment on Yemen?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Has the US achieved any of its goals against Yemen? What has the prosperity guardian guarded?

Or to put it differently. When did the US lose against Taliban? In 2001? Or in 2021?

Taking out Iranian drones and projectiles cost the US over a billion dollars and required the coordination of multiple countries. In a war of attrition the US will lose, just like in Vietnam and Afghanistan before.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/missile-drone-pentagon-houthi-attacks-iran-00132480

“The cost offset is not on our side,” said one DOD official.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You’re just wasting my time at this point without even understanding what you are replying to. Have the Houthis ended the genocide? Isn’t that their goal? Lmao this is why I rarely even bother going back and forth with anyone online, I just get irrelevant BS.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have the Houthis ended the genocide?

No, and if you will define success by only this metric then they aren't successful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Hahahahha I knew your name looked familiar. You’re that user that doesn’t understand what you are replying to. Thanks for the ban, go chop up a journalist lmao