this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
34 points (88.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8541 readers
667 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The previous link was broken, so I've reposted a safer one with archive.org

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They do make the point in the article that even upgrading from two generations back is a waste, as you're getting basically getting no real benefit to having waited two generations instead of one. You may as well upgrade to last generation instead of this one and save yourself some money.

If you're three generations behind, no matter what your upgrade path is, you're getting a significant upgrade, but it's still not worth upgrading to the current gen when last gen is much better value for a marginal performance difference.

The exception to all this is buying the absolute top-of-the-line, which is never good value, but is again significantly inflated in price from the previous gen.