this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
346 points (97.5% liked)

politics

18966 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It doesn’t have to be hard. Harris should go to the top of the ticket, and the campaign apparatus stays the same.

Have her, a former prosecutor, debate Trump and treat that shit like a cross examination.

And make Sanders the VP to make me excited.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Sanders is too old. God love him, but it would not inspire confidence. If we're going for a prominent progressive on the ticket, we'd have to go AOC.

More likely though, Harris will pick someone who is an old white moderate male, though, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's a difference between old and senile and ordinary old. Bernie is just old

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but the uncommitted voter is a moron.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

When you're in your 80s, decline can come about VERY quickly and without warning. It, unfortunately, is much more of a concern than it was in 2016.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Aren't Trump and Sanders the same age? Though, I agree, I feel that Bernie's ship has sailed, sadly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trump is 78, Sanders is 82. Realistically speaking, Trump is also at that age when decline can come very quickly, but:

  1. His cult doesn't care

AND

  1. Considering Trump's 'normal' behavior, how would you even tell
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Trump is also at that age when decline can come very quickly

The decline has already come. I've seen some clips of Trump from 20 years ago. He was never a good person, but he used to be coherent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

That is a ticket I would be happy to vote for

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'd love someone like Hakeem Jeffries, Katie Porter, or (if God exists and is benevolent) Jasmine Crockett. Any of those choices would make me ecstatic.

[–] MagicShel 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I don't know Jasmine Crockett, but Katie Porter is so fucking sharp. No idea if she would run or could win, but she would be a great fucking President.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Katie Porter just lost her senate bid after getting fucked by Schiff. So she is available....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Isn't she also from California? Her and Newsom wouldn't work for the same (legal) reason Trump couldn't go with DeSatan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

That's an interesting point. I wonder if it works better for Harris, having been in DC so long, does she claim that as her residence?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

But vulnerable as a "loser" when added to Harris, who doesn't have a really long track record herself. Also they need someone who can pull a swing state.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Oh bro. You gotta go look up Jasmine Crockett clips on youtube. She's incredible. And hard agree on Katie Porter being a great fucking president.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Trump and his team are not happy that Biden isn't the Nominee anymore. There is absolutely no chance Trump agrees to debate her.