this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
392 points (95.0% liked)

memes

9806 readers
4 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Template

Source - The colors of the grids represent CO2 emissions

The title is a reference to the 2021 Texas power crisis

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

it's insane that so many flyover states are competing (and winning) against fucking California

edit: by winning, i meant having more carbon emissions, not doing better. dumb wording.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People underestimate just how massive California is. There are a lot of people across a large span of land that require electricity. I imagine the map would look very different if it was scaled by population.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

my wording has failed me immensely. i would at least expect people to look at the map and realize what I'm actually trying to say but here we are. that is my point. California has like the population of all these states combined yet all of them are producing more carbon emissions. when i said "winning" i meant in amount of carbon emissions, meaning doing worse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are we looking at the same map? Looks like California is far less emissions heavy than the flyover states. High proportions of solar panel energy, too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are winning in producing emissions

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

that's what I meant. bad wording.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

California has huge tracts of land that get sunshine like 365 days per year.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

so Nevada doesn't get much sunshine?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Nevada spent all their sunshine on hookers and blow.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Makes sense when you realize 12% of Americans live in CA, vs somewhere like WY where 0.17% of Americans live.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

what i meant was there producing more carbon emissions. you would expect more populous areas to produce more carbon emissions