this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
802 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18966 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Old, but seems relevant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It is! Whipped it up for the Political Memes community... and then got banned from Political Memes for 'advocating violence'. Um... whoops.

Maybe it's temporary? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Charity... my choice would be any of those most at risk by a turn in the political environment. Planned Parenthood, any LGBTQ+ resource... if you get a kick out of that meme enough to merit a $20 donation, I have a sneaking suspicion that the venn diagram of your values and mine is pretty close to a clean circle, so if there's something specific you had in mind, you definitely don't need my permission (not that you ever needed my permission on how to spend your own money, but you get the gist!).

 

Edit - To be clear, posting that image in this thread is the 2nd time I posted it. The first posting was in Political Memes here. I realized in hindsight that that might make the post in this thread -not- OC. I created the image, but the one here isn't THE original.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't seem like it's advocating violence at all. It's making fun of someone that did advocate violence when it came after them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I don't think the meme itself was the issue, but the discussion therein. Speculating on the motive, I mentioned the oath military and feds are required to take, and that it advocates violence... I probably shouldn't elaborate or I'll risk a ban here too...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Right, it's not a call to violence for the reader; it tells the reader that Trump was fishing for violent supporters. It's prime "Leopards ate my face" material.

Edit: This was supposed to be a reply to @[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, the oath calls to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. Not really your fault if someone claims that advocates for violence because it's not you issuing a specific and legal order. Doesn't say anything about protecting the government I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I was hoping that the admins on Lemmy aren't the same type of shitheads like the bad ones from Reddit were, yet here we are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's weird that those were the posts they took issue with. I've been pretty vocal about not giving a damn about Nazi lives, former president Agent Orange included... but discussing federal oaths and their implications is what crossed the line?

I can understand the admins being on high alert after an assassination attempt on a presidential candidate though, so... whatever, I'll just eat the ban and shitpost in other communities instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

World is the largest instance, so I understand them having an abundance of caution. Can always post on a smaller instance that doesn't give a shit.