this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
826 points (97.7% liked)

memes

9806 readers
6 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Employers aren't required to pay ai even minimum wage though. I think the fact that ai is shitty isn't going to be enough to save jobs.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Hot take: jobs that are easily taken by AI shouldn't exist

Think about it, do we really need hellish desk jobs?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but the issue is that employers will try to replace non-replaceable jobs along with the replaceable ones. Eventually employers will figure it out and hire people again for the non-replaceable jobs, but in the meantime, real people with real lives will suffer

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

The problem is the "race to the bottom". Sure, some grindy desk jobs can gladly be taken by AI.

What about the jobs that AI does poorly, but when the low cost is taken into account it's still seen as feasible?

Think of all the horrid DTMF phone menus and barely functioning voice recognition systems. We hated these as customers, colleagues, anyone who had to use them despised them

Cheaper than a receptionist, though.

Now imagine that level of frustration and poor service spread across every industry at every level. We're talking about a total collapse of productivity across the entire economy. Not only do people lose their jobs, but the work isn't even getting done to any standard, either.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's just it. A century ago people thought that with the rapid development, we would not have to work anymore. So that didn't happen.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure no one thought that

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Maybe not "the end of all work", but pretty close to it:

John Maynard Keynes predicted a 15 hour work week due to the rapid increases in production from emerging technologies.

He sadly didn't forsee how ridiculous levels of production would become the new norm, subsistence would be mainly tied to employment, and all-encompassing ever-present work would become the state religion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fully agreed. The main holdup is compensation for people, such as universal income.
Not everyone can throw the towel in on a boring desk job and become a rocket surgeon.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago

You get paid based on how hard you are to replace. That's why Cobol (old programing lang) developers make bank while the dude at star bucks makes minimum wage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Sure, I guess we don't need writers, painters, visual artists, musicians and filmmakers. I mean, what do they do really, enrich our culture and move our souls? Pff, AI can do that easily.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

There's definitely subscription fees and energy costs associated with enterprise level AI usage.