this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
1653 points (94.9% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
815 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Am I the only one who thinks once something becomes a monolith of a platform, then it should be regulated (or dare I say), nationalized/ turned into a non profit?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's called state communism and america would burn to the ground before it happens

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is being heavily regulated communism? We have that right now for various industries.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not communism but it's antithetical to the American spirit of free market capitalism. They prefer their growth unchecked and their corporations unregulated, just as the founding fathers intended.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What if it was something you were hosting and someone told you what to do? Kind of three antithesis of Lemmy, really.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The difference is the barrier to entry and the size. Realistically, it is very hard to make a YouTube competitor given how high the server costs are and how sticky the platform is.

As a platform (or a company), gets bigger and bigger, it has more influence on society and it’s private status becomes more and more detrimental to the good of humanity.

In the example you said, what I host would not have a huge impact on society, hence I would not need to be as responsible for what I do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the breaking point is size, then what qualifies the size? What if you hosted your stuff at a medium scale in your house as a hobby? Does this mean that an anonymous person can demand that you host certain content? At what point is your infra not yours anymore?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the breaking point is size, then what qualifies the size?

When it’s a monopoly (maybe even before that, but definitely when it’s a monopoly).

Please see standard oil and how anti trust suites broke that up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You host stuff in your house, and create a monopoly. Does a guy in a suit show up at your door to claim it? How does running a service as a hobby compare to oil?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How can I have a monopoly by hosting something in my house? If you create a forum, you don’t have a monopoly over all forums, you have control over your own forum.

Your confusing one product with an entire sector/industry.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why can't you have a monopoly with something you host yourself? What product am I confusing with another sector?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you give me an example of something being a monopoly that you host yourself?

A monopoly is a product or service that has no or little competition and has become a household name, like YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Everything is hosted by someone's effort and will. Where the service is hosted or how well the service operates under load is irrelevant. You could have racks of metal in a data center that you rent, host infra with SaaS providers, or have a single host at home. A person can absolutely set up whatever they want at scale, and it's not in bad form to have someone help them and pay them for their effort.

In my opinion, it's the content and practices that matter, not how well the service works. People choose to use most providers because they want to use them. As an example, there are thousands of social media sites, yet Facebook is one of the dominant platforms. Every user could never log in forever starting tomorrow, and they would dry up, but realistically, this won't happen. Personally, I don't mind that lots of people are on Facebook. I just don't like their practices, which are so exploitative that they regularly break laws.

My point in asking all these questions is that I don't think it matters if 5 users choose to use something you're hosting or 5 million, or even if you make money off it. If your service is successful because it's a good service, and you're being ethical about it, I don't think that someone should come take it away. I do think that you should be obeying laws and paying taxes, but that just reinforces my ethics position.

However, this is just my opinion, which is just as valid as yours. You made an example with YouTube; what opinions do you have about YouTube, and what actions would you take? How would you describe little to no competition, and how would you create competition? What problems do you see with a product name?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my opinion, it's the content and practices that matter, not how well the service works.

In that case you should agree that a publicly traded company should not be left to their own devices since their main goal is increasing shareholder value, regardless what practices they use.

People choose to use most providers because they want to use them.

That’s not true, many people use WhatsApp outside of North America since it has become the defacto mode of communication. There are plenty of people who use them but wish not to.

My point in asking all these questions is that I don't think it matters if 5 users choose to use something you're hosting or 5 million, or even if you make money off it.

But that totally makes a huge difference, the more people use your service, the more or an impact you have on society. And the more responsible you should be with how your service affects people’s lives.

If your service is successful because it's a good service, and you're being ethical about it, I don't think that someone should come take it away.

My entire point is that when a company, who has become a monopoly, is no longer being ethical, there should be intervention. If anything, you should be agreeing with that based on what you said.

I do think that you should be obeying laws and paying taxes, but that just reinforces my ethics position.

Look up how much taxes google paid last year.

You made an example with YouTube; what opinions do you have about YouTube, and what actions would you take?

I do like YouTube overall, would change a few though. But regardless of what I like or dislike, I think YouTube has become so influential that it should not be solely controlled by a for profit company. There at least needs to be some oversight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Vimeo. Yeah it’s not as big easy for them to point to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That you can host yourself? Isn’t that another big company?

Ironically I go to Vimeo when the age restriction thing stops me from watching what I want (I don’t log in).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm speaking to Youtube having competition or not