UK Nature and Environment

382 readers

26 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

129

Young people can't remember how much more wildlife there used to be (organicallyhuman.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Walking in England’s New Forest in 1892, butterfly collector S. G. Castle Russell encountered such numbers of the insects that they “were so thick that I could hardly see ahead”. On another occasion, he “captured a hundred purple hairstreaks” with two sweeps of his net.

Patrick Barkham, who recounts these riots of nature in his 2010 book on butterflies, laments never seeing such a sight. However, new research suggests Barkham is a rarity, because a lot of people are forgetting, or just don’t appreciate, how much wildlife there was.

To gauge this effect, Lizzie Jones at Royal Holloway, University of London, compared population records dating back to 1966 of 10 UK bird species against public perceptions of those birds. More than 900 people told her how abundant they thought the species – including declining ones such as house sparrows – were today and when they were aged 18.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can live with them. Flies on the other hand… even if their removal means a major disruption in the food chain, I’d be on the fence.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Ticks are what I’d be willing to monkey’s paw wish away. My wife’s a park ranger and a few times a week we’re doing full body tick checks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That sounds like a plus to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Hah I'm ashamed to admit that “I’ll check you for ticks” has been jokingly used as a come-on more than once. Although when you do actually find ticks it kills the mood.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago