this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
180 points (90.2% liked)

Gaming

19967 readers
3 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Is anyone else bothered (but not surprised) by the fact that Amazon/Twitch agreed to cover it up for him? Seems pretty wild that they should be off the hook for working to protect his image after doing predatory shit like this.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago

I think they kept it on the low because they don't want people realizing that they're viewing the contents of their whispers, even if you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Everyone will forget about twitch's involvement within a week. Just like every time literally any big event happens with any company.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's weird is twitch paid him instead of him paying them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

They paid him to go away and to shut up. Twitch letting one of their most popular creators message sexual content to a minor over their platform for years is a PR nightmare. Shows the lack of oversight social media has. Why would they even allow a 12 year old the ability to private message a 30 year old to begin with?!

Edit: and I'm sure twitch found more dirt going through all his communications. This pedo was even planning a meet up with this minor before the minors parent put a stop to it and notified twitch.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Beware that points like this suggest that messaging platforms should be monitoring all communications sent between users. If that's the world you want to live in, ok, fine... But in this case the guy that committed the crime is the one who has been punished. Isn't that the correct result?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm just saying that, maybe if you are a creator making content primarily watched by children, the trade off for making money (millions in this case.) off of our platform, is we get to monitor your communications with said audience on our platform? It's like saying a banker who uses their work email to coordinate a crime. My work has email monitoring that looks for financial crimes because surprisingly people are dumb enough to use work email for elicit activities. Yes his messages to individuals are "private" but should they be when in a position of power? He messaged a minor through twitches chat (twitch is essentially his whole job) and twitch has NO safeguards to prevent abuse?!