this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
9 points (90.9% liked)

Python

6439 readers
60 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

PastNovember 2023

October 2023

July 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
💓 Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
jnovinger
erlingur
norambna
9
Python's UV tool is even better (micro.webology.dev)
submitted 8 months ago by jnovinger to c/python
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Andy 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have a pip-tools wrapper thing that now optionally uses uv instead. Aside from doing the pip-tools things faster, the main advantage I've found, and what really motivated me to support and recommend uv with it, is that uv creates new venvs MUCH faster than python's venv module, which is really annoyingly slow for that operation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@Andy @xantoxis

The issue with uv is the same biggest issue that Python faces, maintenance costs.

Python coders are not Rust coders. Which is quite the head scratcher.

Learning Rust techstack creates an enormous barrier to entry when it comes to adopting, uv.

uv main advantage is not speed, it's the override for resolving dependency hell

If it didn't bring something more to the table, besides speed, no one would care

[–] Andy 1 points 5 months ago

If it didn’t bring something more to the table, besides speed, no one would care

I'm literally saying its speed in certain operations makes an appreciable difference in my workflows, especially when operating on tens of venvs at a time. I don't know why you want to fight me on my own experience.

I'm not telling anyone who doesn't want to use uv to do so. Someone asked about motivation, and I shared mine.