this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
83 points (98.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5219 readers
374 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
83
The US Supreme Court agreed on Monday to consider reviving a critical approval for a railroad project that would carry crude oil and boost fossil fuel production in rural eastern Utah. (apnews.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

approval for a railroad project

Let's see...

that would carry crude oil

๐Ÿ˜ญ what the heck

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, they're trying to extract a bunch of tar, which requires enormous energy inputs to turn into a useful fuel, and which is tough to transport by pipeline.

[โ€“] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It really feels like SCOTUS noticed that environmentally-conscious people are advocating for expansion of rail, and will now rule in favour of this project just to spite them.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

The bait was real. I knew there was a catch, i just knew it. But I let my guard down anyway.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

They're all about immanentizing the eschaton.