this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
553 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

35124 readers
188 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Windows 2000 was the last Windows that I felt I could just slap on any old hardware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Which is weird, since Win2k definitely had lower hardware compatibility than XP, Vista, 7, etc.

It wasn't consumer-focused and just didn't have the driver compatibility from vendors yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Quite the contrary, it had exemplary compatibility, including Plug'n'Play and wide native USB support.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

With the things you tried it did.

Believe me, I was part of a team testing compatibility.