this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024

22 points (89.3% liked)

Python

6466 readers

21 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

Past

November 2023

PyCon Ireland 2023, 11-12th
PyData Tel Aviv 2023 14th

October 2023

PyConES Canarias 2023, 6-8th
DjangoCon US 2023, 16-20th (!django 💬)

July 2023

PyDelhi Meetup, 2nd
PyCon Israel, 4-5th
DFW Pythoneers, 6th
Django Girls Abraka, 6-7th
SciPy 2023 10-16th, Austin
IndyPy, 11th
Leipzig Python User Group, 11th
Austin Python, 12th
EuroPython 2023, 17-23rd
Austin Python: Evening of Coding, 18th
PyHEP.dev 2023 - "Python in HEP" Developer's Workshop, 25th

August 2023

PyLadies Dublin, 15th
EuroSciPy 2023, 14-18th

September 2023

PyData Amsterdam, 14-16th
PyCon UK, 22nd - 25th

🐍 Python project:

💓 Python Community:

#python IRC for general questions
#python-dev IRC for CPython developers
PySlackers Slack channel
Python Discord server
Python Weekly newsletters
Mailing lists
Forum

✨ Python Ecosystem:

🌌 Fediverse

Communities

#python on Mastodon
c/django on programming.dev
c/pythorhead on lemmy.dbzer0.com

Projects

Pythörhead: a Python library for interacting with Lemmy
Plemmy: a Python package for accessing the Lemmy API
pylemmy pylemmy enables simple access to Lemmy's API with Python
mastodon.py, a Python wrapper for the Mastodon API

Feeds

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

22

What Git library to choose? (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/python

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I happen to write a lot of python code dealing with git repositories. Currently I am calling the git command line tool from python and interpret the output.

This solution really doesn't scale well. Can you recommend a python library that wraps git functionality?

I have found three:

GitPython: Seems to work well, but it is in maintenance mode, unlikely to be improved. It also does not have any type hints making working with it annoying.
pygit2: Seems well supported and has type hints. But it also seems very low level and pretty tedious to use.
dulwich: Looks very promising feature wise but I'm unsure how well it is supported. It seems like an ambitious project being largely done by just one person.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Corbin 1 points 6 months ago

With no more details? I'd go with Dulwich. libgit2 is overly picky about inputs and can't be hacked apart at all, and this affects its bindings too. I recently found myself monkey-patching Dulwich to allow otherwise-forbidden characters in refs, and this would have been fundamentally impossible with anything on top of libgit2.