this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
64 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7285 readers
2 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Evidently the joints on the flaps still need a little work into not letting gases through, but it seemed to still have enough actuation to keep the spacecraft stable until the engines took over for the landing burn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The live was such a rollercoaster of emotions.

The moment the fin started to melt I thought this was the end of it, but it still hold on, and hold on. Then the image disappeared do I though that was it, but no it continued after that, we get the image back.

I start to think that it might be able to crash on water, maybe not in one piece but it would be a big improvement comparef to the last launch, especially since they already soft landed the booster.

And then it get a few km away from water level and at the last minute it DOES THE BELLY FLOP AND SOFT LAND ON WATER !

I had absolutely zero hope of that happening !

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I thought for sure the camera was toast when it went all purple, it looks like the lense was essentially gone and we are just seeing the raw output of the CCD but then the flap moved and there was a few frames where you could actually see the flap and the damage but it's still actuating!

Amazing engineering.

There is essentially no better data that this regarding what the error tolerance is on the flaps. Should help create lots if reliability in future versions