this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
819 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32348 readers
1030 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There aren't "slaves" in git, though. The term "master" in that context is that of a master copy.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nope. Bitkeeper used it in the master-slave pairing and the term was carried forward. Gitlab did a whole writeup about it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

"Historically, the default name for this initial branch was master. This term came from Bitkeeper, a predecessor to Git. Bitkeeper referred to the source of truth as the "master repository" and other copies as "slave repositories". This shows how common master/slave references have been in technology, and the difficulty in knowing how the term master should be interpreted."

Excerpt from the link the other member posted above! You're welcome!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

It's funny, because a quick online search shows gitlab runs operations in Saudi Arabia. But at least a bunch of idiot westerners get to feel good about themselves 🤷‍♂️