this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
36 points (97.4% liked)

Greentext

4375 readers
1414 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Very few game companies actually make a lot of money from cosmetics and ingame items. Most don't.

It's also stupid to think companies should do things for free. That's not the world we live in. It's an exception

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I just did a minimal amount of googling and this is absolutely not true. Micro transactions have outpaced full game sales by almost 3:1. The entire model of free to play games relies on microtransactions. The biggest games in the world right now are f2p games or paid games with f2p models. I dunno where you're getting your info from, ancedotally, I'm sure, and maybe you just don't play games like that... But the rest of the casual game player population absolutely does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Very few game companies actually make a lot of money from cosmetics and ingame items. Most don't.

The companies doing these full price remasters 100% are the ones making millions from cosmetics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Cosmetics and in-game items (microtransactions) are how games make money hand-over-fist.

What world do you live in?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

That first point is not true at all. There are entire games built around the paid cosmetics. League of Legends and everyone who follows that model for example. There are more than a few, but you're right on the second point. I mean it's not nice to call people stupid, but I suppose that's not what we're discussing.