Fuck AI

Alternate frontend

An AI avatar made to look and sound like the likeness of a man who was killed in a road rage incident addressed the court and the man who killed him: “To Gabriel Horcasitas, the man who shot me, it is a shame we encountered each other that day in those circumstances,” the AI avatar of Christopher Pelkey said. “In another life we probably could have been friends. I believe in forgiveness and a God who forgives. I still do.”

It was the first time the AI avatar of a victim—in this case, a dead man—has ever addressed a court, and it raises many questions about the use of this type of technology in future court proceedings.

Source (Bluesky)

Source (Tumblr). alternate frontend

AI Art IS dying. In this video, you'll hear how AI art is failing left and right, and it's not doing as well as they say. It's flawed, unethical, legally ambiguous, and that means it's time is almost up. Artists: don't worry about AI art, just persist. I believe in you!

I was searching if it's possible to play Valorant on Linux. This was one of the first Articles Qwant recommended me: www.gameslearningsociety.org

The style, the writing and the fact that Valorant cant be downloaded via Steam screams AI to me. I've noticed more and more often lately that some Articles(example) about specific topics don't go much in depth and seem very generic. Additional decorated with bad AI generated images.

This development really worries me, because you have to be constantly on your guard as to whether an article is really trustworthy. Cause obviously: LLM is not. Can you recommend a DNS Blocklist which includes those Websites who clearly abuse AI to generate trucks full of AI shit? Thank you!

I feel like there’s a substantial overlap between “fuck AI” and “fuck entitled misanthropic man-children”.

Daniel Stenberg is done with this shit.

That's it. I've had it. I'm putting my foot down on this craziness.

1. Every reporter submitting security reports on #Hackerone for #curl now needs to answer this question:

"Did you use an AI to find the problem or generate this submission?"

(and if they do select it, they can expect a stream of proof of actual intelligence follow-up questions)

2. We now ban every reporter INSTANTLY who submits reports we deem AI slop. A threshold has been reached. We are effectively being DDoSed. If we could, we would charge them for this waste of our time.

We still have not seen a single valid security report done with AI help.

To be clear, the image was part of the response.

Source (Via Xcancel)

No salary, but you do get to "treat the product as though it was your own"

My guess is any CV given will be fed through a few algorithms without much oversight so if someone were to upload a fork bomb made to burn through tokens I'm not sure it would be noticed until it was too late.

Unavailable at source, here's their Bluesky.

cross-posted from: https://feditown.com/post/1309705

https://claytonwramsey.com/blog/prompt/