this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm looking forward to our market share doubling from almost nothing to almost nothing. Still, not a terrible idea.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Presenting in terms of marketshare is maybe not the best metric. My understanding is that the EU motivation here isn't so much the chips themselves as is it a stable supply chain for industries that rely on said chips.

It might be better to measure what percentage of existing EU "critical demand", for some definition of "critical demand", can be met domestically.

That is, the EU's goal probably isn't "become the dominant player in the chip market" so much as "don't permit problems abroad to knock out critical EU industry". It probably is not the case that they need to have a large percentage of absolute marketshare to achieve that goal.

I'd also add that the US is subsidizing several fabs for what sounds like similar reasons.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I apologize if I am incorrect, but chip manufacturing is known to be quite challenging in terms of financial and workforce requirements. I suspect @wintersummerland knows how things work in EU and unfortunately I have to agree that we need a lot of luck to get to this 20% mark.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think the big issue with workforce is getting people onto the career path. Semiconductor manufacturing has traditionally been localised to Asian countries, and even if people from the west would like to specialise with that they just don't have as many options. If Europe puts large investments into the industry and recruits out of universities I think they could definitely build up a strong workforce. Maybe not quite in the timeframe they're aiming for, but there's something to be said for ambitious aims to encourage a harder push.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, and I have a mixture of little faith and Dark thoughts as I m lacking examples of well thought out successful digital growths policies. See European search engine efforts, European cloud initiative (where nextcloud is arguably a promising product, which existed before the EU efforts and I am unsure if it is even being aided by the initive) I'm happy to learn about successful efforts if you know some.

To our friend @DarkThoughts of the kbin universe, unfortunately I cannot answer to your post, but your answer is here.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're not saying they're aiming for a large share of the market, just twice what they have now. If they have a very small share now, while willingly relying on foreign production, it shouldn't be hard to double that share by improving their underdeveloped manufacturing capacity.

We could joke and say two times 0% is still 0%, but what they're aiming for is probably something like two times 10%, ie 20%. Not a hell of a lot, but twice what they have now.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ