death penalties are brutal and archaic, and open the door to innocent people getting executed when combined with any legal systems inherent imperfections, not to mention the outright laziness, incompetence and downright evil thats commonly found within them
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
51 points (98.1% liked)
News
23014 readers
7 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Clearly this guy is guilty as hell, but I still think he should get life in prison, not death. There's already been enough killing. Even if he gets the death sentence, he's still going to sit in prison for years or decades until all the legal mechanisms have been exhausted. Let's not spend any more court or lawyer time here.
If I was facing life or the death penalty, I choose death.
Wasting away, fighting for survival, no entertainment, no vices (in theory), etc.
No appeals, expedite it. Take me behind the courthouse and put a few rounds in my head. Be thorough.
I'm miserable enough living in "the greatest country in the world," just get it over with. My "life" is lost either way, death just prevents the rampant suffering along the way.
I never thought cost was a good argument against the death penalty. If it was cheaper would you be convinced the other way?
No. It's not about the financial cost. It's primarily about the possibility of making a mistake. Here, it doesn't appear to be the case, but even so, like I said, it will still tie up the courts with appeals, when they could be hearing other cases. Just make it a life sentence in the first place and get it over with.
Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.
Right so if it isn't about the financial cost then why bring it up? You have better arguments don't play a weak one.
If I believed in the justice of the death penalty it wouldn't convince me out of it costing more vs life sentences. If I believe the death penalty is unjust it wouldn't convince me that it was good even if the costs were reversed.
I didn't. I said court and lawyer time, not money.
Does that change the argument?
The jury in the trial of Pittsburgh synagogue mass shooter Robert Bowers found Thursday he is eligible for the death penalty, shifting the focus of the proceeding to whether he should be sentenced to death or life in prison.
HEY, EVERYONE!
We got a reader here!
Thinks they're too good for a gut reaction. Captain Letters of the SS Literati. Well la tee da.
Fry him.
view more: next ›