this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5246 readers
349 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Results contradict public view that disrupting events such as Wimbledon and Pride achieves nothing

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It makes sense. Protests are meant to be disruptive; that's the point. People are talking about the Wimbledon protest, and lots will grumble, and some will support what they did, but at least it becomes a matter of conversation and is brought to the public consciousness.

If those protestors just handed out flyers outside of Wimbledon instead, no one would have given a shit.