this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
114 points (82.0% liked)

politics

18966 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CBC.ca

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Oh yeah. Let trump back in and see how that works for them.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can't for the life of me understand how these people think. A no vote for Biden is a vote for Trump. Simple as that. Now I'm not excited about Biden but I prefer Biden 100x over Trump and the right wing Christian militia.

It's a choice between someone who will slap you in the face and someone who will shoot you in the groin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's not a fair statement. I am sure Trump would shoot you in the groin AND slap you in the face.

People who think Trump won't further exacerbate the situation are deluded. But that's the problem here, these people aren't thinking at all. They either can't make the connection or don't care.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I think its good to apply this pressure in the moment. This is the people showing some of way they can do. Regardless of the outcome later. I really don't think what they're saying is they'll vote for Trump. But they have to apply pressure somehow.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. The Biden administration still has time to get things right. But after the last few weeks, I honestly think they don't have any pull on Netanyahu. So he'll suffer the consequences if he doesn't do something else. He has enough options.

Also the only thing Americans can do right now, is to mobilize the same count of people that are dropping out right now. I mean, there's pro and anti Palestine right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly think they don’t have any pull on Netanyahu

They have some pull, but politically Netanyahu is a dead man walking. The problem is that it's arguably not in the US interest if Israel holds elections now. Someone like Ben-Gvir would become even more influential.

A reminder:

Itamar Ben-Gvir ... is an Israeli lawyer and far-right politician who serves as the Minister of National Security. ... Ben-Gvir, a settler in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has faced charges of hate speech against Arabs and was known to have a portrait in his living room of Israeli-American terrorist Baruch Goldstein, who massacred 29 Palestinian Muslim worshipers and wounded 125 others in Hebron, in the 1994 Cave of the Patriarchs massacre. ... He was also previously convicted of supporting a terrorist group known as Kach, which espoused Kahanism, an extremist religious Zionist ideology. ... Under his leadership, the Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power), a party which espouses Kahanism and anti-Arabism, won six seats in the 2022 Israeli legislative election ... He has called for the expulsion of Arab citizens of Israel who are not loyal to Israel. Ben Gvir is "widely known for his openly racist, anti-Arab views and activities" ... led several visits to the Temple Mount as activist and member of Knesset, contentious marches through Jerusalem's Old City Muslim Quarter, and set up an office in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood which witnessed several evictions of Palestinians. On 3 January 2023, he visited the Temple Mount where the al-Aqsa Mosque is located, spurring an international wave of criticism that labelled his visit purposely provocative. As a lawyer, he is known for defending Jewish radicals and terrorists on trial in Israel. ... Prior to entering politics, he defended Jews spitting at Christians as a "an ancient Jewish custom". ... Ben-Gvir is married to Ayala Nimrodi... The couple has five children, and they live in the Israeli settlement of Kiryat Arba/Hebron, which is deemed illegal under international law, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itamar_Ben-Gvir

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for that, I've heard of him but not in so much detail.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Any material action that leads to Trump (or a Trump imitator) returning to office is material support for fascism.

"I'll let fascists take over my country if the liberals here don't stop the fascists in that country over there" is ideological support for fascism.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I interpreted this more as "we'll vote against you in the primary and get angrier when you subvert our votes"

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure trump will do better. Take your time when aiming at your own foot...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ugh.

America is going to re-elect Trump, not having learnt the lesson from last time, and here in Europe our politicians have become complacent again and continued to procrastinate on defense spending. But hey, maybe Ukraine will get the F16s they needed a year ago if they wanted to have any chance of avoiding a stalemate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

But hey, maybe Ukraine will get the F16s they needed a year ago if they wanted to have any chance of avoiding a stalemate.

R has been resisting Ukraine aid. They aren't getting shit if Trump gets in.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is stupid. Don't throw down an ultimatum you're unprepared to act on. Are they really going to risk a Trump reelection if Biden doesn't follow through? Almost certainly not, and they'd be idiots if they did.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are they really going to risk a Trump reelection if Biden doesn’t follow through?

I mean yes. Young voters being disappointed with the electoral process and not voting has been a problem for a while, and Biden isn't making it better. Unfortunately yes, they are likely prepared to act on it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then in that case, they're idiots, and bear a share of the blame if Trump is reelected.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Biden bears the blame if he LOSES the election to trump. He’s the one running. Its his responsibility to EARN the votes. A ceasefire of an ongoing genocide is a tiny ask from “the most progressive president ever” who also is causing millions of deaths in the US from pretending the pandemic is over, making jokes about not wearing masks, and doing nothing to enforce clean air in schools, businesses, etc.

It’s insane people are more angry at the threat of not voting for biden if he doesn’t do the bare minimum of calling for a ceasefire than being mad at biden for funding a genocide by an apartheid state using.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah true enough, but what I'm saying it's not an empty threat. Some of these much-needed voters will sit out the election if nothing is done about this mess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That blame cuts both ways. Biden neglecting the progressive leaders if the party is his own undoing. The right is happy to sink centrists, and thats why the US is drifting so far right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The rallies came one day after a sitting member of Congress, Palestinian-American Rashida Tlaib, released a video that accused her party's leader of supporting a genocide and ended with a sombre promise: "We will remember in 2024."

The admonitions of this disproportionately — but not exclusively — young, progressive, Muslim-American crowd don't appear to represent majority opinion in the United States.

"[It's] the language of votes," said Nihad Awad, executive director and co-founder of the Council on American Islamic Relations, before rattling off a list of swing states with significant Muslim populations.

On the other hand, Biden has negotiated the opening of the humanitarian corridor into Gaza, and has publicly — and repeatedly — urged Israel not to give into vengeful impulses and to protect civilian lives.

Tariq Nayfeh, a medical doctor who attended the Washington rally, said he's hearing horror stories from colleagues and friends in Gaza and the West Bank.

Trump has promised to ban refugees from Gaza and bar immigrants who express sympathy for Hamas, while some other Republicans are proposing legislation to expel Palestinians from the U.S.


The original article contains 1,105 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This comment section should prove a nice starting point for a "if you try to hold Biden to a standard even a tiny bit above 'is not Trump', then that means you genuinely want Trump to win" party soldier/false dichotomy insister blocklist..

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What are people supposed to do when each election is close enough that any loss of support means handing over the presidency to an authoritarian wannabe?

I'm sure many would like to hold him to a higher standard, but the risk of ending up with a fascist as president is way too high.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There you go with the false equivalency.

You can support politicians without doing so blindly and unquestioningly. In fact, complacency like yours is one of the main factors that caused the conditions that made something as bizarrely awful as a Trump candidacy viable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But you have a two party system?

Are you still going to vote dem then and just keep making empty threats about not voting for them while requesting ceasefire?

What are your other options here?

[–] mild_deviation 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The only option is to continue to vote for the least-bad candidates, and work to change the voting system such that a two party system is no longer inevitable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I see that you're aggressively ignoring the point in favor of the very false dichotomy I'm on the record as fed up with.

To list the thousands of better things to do than either a) reflexively defend Biden no matter how wrong his stance is or b) vote for Trump would take a lot of time and effort better used in other ways than speaking to wilfully deaf ears.

Fortunately, improving my Lemmy experience by adding you to the aforementioned list after adding a user note to remind me why takes significantly less of both than even writing this reply.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You keep avoiding the question. If i don't know the point you're making, I can't be ignoring it.

What is the point you are trying to make here?

I don't care about all the ways you are not making your point, you've listed those already.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The title of the thread reads “no ceasefire, no votes”.

If the Democratic nominee doesn’t win, who wins?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It’s always reduced to a binary choice; a complacency of the mind:

Complacency is “a feeling of smug or uncritical satisfaction with oneself or one’s achievements.” It’s a false belief that you’re doing the right things to advance or improve/maintain your life, when you’re really not. It’s a hostility or antipathy to criticism, self-awareness or soul-searching.

America should strive to do better.

load more comments
view more: next ›