this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
73 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
29 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t know what the path forward is for this platform, but good grief, I’m out. It’s slow, it’s impossible to set up new communities, it’s rife with political misgivings about the founders (justified), and most importantly, it’s just not fun to use

I’ll be at squabbles.io if anyone needs me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I’m glad to see you telling us and coming forward on this, and that these steps are being taken. Lemmy is a small project, so expecting it to have robust mod tools isn’t realistic. Former Redditors here probably know that some subs have closed indefinitely simply because without good third party mod tools they’ll be near impossible to run safely.

Everything does feel quite new and volatile on this side of the Fediverse. The Mastodon instance I use has a very long list of blocked instances, especially since it’s aimed at LGBTQ+ users. There’s some messed up people out there, and I appreciate the action on the part of the admins. Just slapping a “safe space” sticker on something does not automatically make it one, and it makes me feel really good to be on an instance that understands that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Started on lemmy.world but came here because of the flood of toxic users over there. Seems like the right call for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I respect it. I saw someone who said on lemmy.world that Beehaw needing a "Why are you joining?" was requiring an essay. I typed in like 8 words and I got in.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have had some questions that I can't seem to get answered over on world regarding moderation of the 'false'/shell/local beehaw communities left behind.

Idk if anyone here will know, but background essentially is that while the beehaw communities are not live and posts from beehaw/federated instances are not visible, to a world user the community itself appears as normal (albeit with low engagement) and can be posted/commented in as normal with no indication the community is no longer moderated by beehaw mods.

So how does moderation work in this regard? For example is the LGBTQ+@beehaw community now completely unmoderated for world users? Who does user reports made in those communities go to now, as world never had moderators for those communities?

I'm concerned that unless world mutually defederates, there is essentially moderation-free pockets that are rife for trolls to overtake. Then because of the lack of UI indicators that the communities are not the real version can put unsuspecting world users to being exposed to harm under the beehaw banner, which will give the false impression that beehaw allow this behaviour. Can someone help explain how the moderation works in these circumstances?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Personally at least I had no expectations of your team moderating or otherwise being responsible for the content coming from those instances and thought it was enough to use the new icon set to clearly identify content from Beehaw vs the others.

It's a shame because such a move feels very anti-fediverse to me but I am new to the platform so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You guys outlined good enough reasons for your decision. I hope this will make things easier to work with.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disappointing, but understandable given the tools (or lack thereof) available for moderation at the minute. I’d like to see something like the Message Rewrite Facility system that Akkoma has, that gives you a lot more fine-grained control over what happens to incoming messages from other instances, although I’m not sure how some of that would work in this format. I’m sure something will come further down the line.

Personally I’m not bothered, I’m setting up my own single-user instance (to go with my current Akkoma one) so I can subscribe to whatever from anywhere without having to be responsible for the safety of other users. Then anything I see is my own fault.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think just like with email, systems will have to be built up to give instance owners more control of what other instances can do to their instance. I see a lot of infrastructure possibilities here, spam filters, relays, directories, so many things are possible and while it kinda sucks, it's also great that the fediverse has grown to a size where this kind of thing is necessary already.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Well I was worried, but I can still access the communities I'm subscribed to from those instances so I can appreciate this more.

My biggest issue with Reddit has been the lack of nuanced discussion. Everything is just black or white. If we can keep that element out of this instance I'll be happy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, so just to confirm, I won't lose any of the communities I'm subscribed to?

That's a relief, I thought I was going to lose out on a lot of the Lemmyverse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The posts and communities are frozen from the time the defederation took place onwards - only a "local" Beehaw copy remains.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weird - I can still view both banned instances using Jerboa app! Not sure if that is a glitch or I'm just not understanding something properly.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

me too, I can still see futurama at https://beehaw.org/c/[email protected] for instance, so I don't know what it means? I think it is that we can still see everything at lemmy.world, but all the users on lemmy.world cannot see the communities/posts on beehaw ?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, not to be cold to this decision (because I totally understand that this didn't come lightly and don't want to "well ackshually" the mod team) but given I'm new to the fediverse as a concept, what does this mean for me as an end-user? Can I no longer engage with those communities at all? Or rather, what does defederating mean overall?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Geez, the concept of federation is already splintering. I understand you guys have your reasons but this just splinters the fediverse and makes it worse for users.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes things better for users who want a well moderated space. These sites are public, so it's not like you can't log out to view what's going on in a community if you still want to follow it. It'll probably end up being similar to how redditors interact with tweets, if someone sees something interesting they probably will screenshot/copy it and pop it into a community they do have an account with to continue the discussion there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there any plan to grow the existing mod team?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›