Seems like we need an r/DataHoarders equivalent, or a "DigitalArchiving" magazine/community.
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
60 points (98.4% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54476 readers
402 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yes, that would be awesome. Right now most discussions regarding data hoarding are done in self hosting communities while e.g. adblocking discussions are often done here in the piracy community. That would both be communities with great potential and also even kind of fitting to the dbzer0 instance.
The first one to see the need is the one who needs to fix it. ;-)
Some libraries have these to scan books fast. My old university had one to scan really old books (about 1500). I'm sure it could be used on magazines, you just have to find a library that has one AND is willing to let you use it.
This is the correct answer.
It's the conventionally correct answer indeed, but everything that does the job is correct here. Cutting open the bindings and letting it run through a scanner which can pull in the pages also does the job, but the magazines are trash after that. But then again, it could be less labour intensive and easier to automate. Also, you can do it at home with a simple scanner.
I do this sometimes for double printed pages of letters / scripts / my old diary. First i let my scanner pull all sheets on one site, then the other. There is a tool which can sort the pages afterwards accordingly with one click.
yeah. that's probably the easiest by far. just cut the bindings and feed them into the ADF of your scanner.
those book scanners are also nice. i scanned a few chapters of books at the university library. but it takes like 10 minutes per 100 pages. you turn the pages manually. and there is a foot switch to trigger the camera above. you need a good podcast while continuously turning pages for half an hour.
Nice machine! How does it turn the pages?
There are some that "suck" the current page towards the scanner head, but i think most of them rely on manually flipping the page and pressing a button to scan or make a photo.
If you want to do it efficiently, a camera isn’t the best way to go because it requires manually turning the pages. It’s cheap but labor intensive.
Scanners are so cheap now that any decent one can be had for $120-200. But if you want to take this a step further, buy a second hand printer-scanner combo. Doesn’t matter if the printer is broken because you don’t need it. Just make sure it has batch scanning abilities.
Get a cheap paper slicer /guillotine and rip the magazines into uniform stacks. Load into the tray and start scanning.
The thing you’ll likely run into is the tray not having the capacity required to scan all sheets in one go. Therefore, you’ll need to scan part files and combine them on the back end. You likely need paid software for this, but there is probably open source options. Either way, fly the black flag lol…
I did this after purchasing $800 worth of mechanical PE prep materials and wanted the flexibility and future proofing of my purchase. This proved a worth while endeavor after a flood took my hard copies. YMMV
SCNNER HALT:LOAD YELLOW INK TO RESUME
There are free online pdf combining websites.
I prefer not to damage my magazines in any way, at least for now.
I think the fastest and reliable, but definitely not the cheapest way, would be a document scanner like a Fujitsu IX something. you'd basically cut all the pages so that they're a format the scanner can accept, stuff then all in there and hit scan. A few seconds later you have a pdf. Using a flatbed scanner is probably the slowest approach, but the one with the highest quality. The cheapest way would be taking photos with your mobile, there are frames that you can buy (or make yourself) where you put your phone in on the top and then place the page below, so that you'll get a consistent quality. light can get tricky with these.
Way back when google was scanning stuff in, they open sourced their scanner, some info about it here, might be a starting point ? https://hackaday.com/2012/11/16/google-books-team-open-sources-their-book-scanner/
view more: next ›