this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
674 points (99.1% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s insane. That’s like $600/month

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It doesn't even include the time to prepare and commute, just the monetary cost.

If they paid overtime to commute it would be even more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I agree with the premise, but this rub me the wrong way:

"$16 on lunch, $13 on breakfast and coffee."

It sounds like entitlement if you think someone should be paying for something you already do at home (eat), but choose to do it in the most expensive way possible.

Make food and coffee at home and bring it to work. And if you're already buying expensive shop meals to eat at home, why complain about spending that outrageous amount of money when you're outside the home?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I suspect people are not spending as much on nonessentials and businesses are seeing this as their workplaces being empty and not spending. But something tells me it's a nationwide thing, people are thinking twice due to inflation and I doubt bringing people back is gonna make them want to spend money the way they used to. My claim is based on layoffs and stocking issues.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

My work pays for my lunch, it's how it should be. I'm here for them, if I wasn't I'd eat at home.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›