If they chose not to participate, wouldn't that mean they would not be covered by Medicare at all?
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2244 readers
79 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If they won't negotiate on the price, then a 95% tax on all sales of that drug will be imposed the next year. So they've got a lot of incentive to negotiate.
See https://www.aarp.org/politics-society/advocacy/info-2022/medicare-drug-price-negotiations.html
I'm guessing they made the penalty a tax, because this was a part of the inflation reduction act passed by democrats, and to evade the filibuster with the reconciliation rules the law has to strictly involve budgets and taxes.
Crazy how the US government throwing its weight around at corporations works really well. Almost like if they did it as much as European countries do we'd have equivalent QOL and have something to show for being the richest country on Earth.