And something as bad (if not worse) is coming to the EU too https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
264 points (96.5% liked)
Privacy
32120 readers
369 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Jesus christ. Thanks for sharing, I had no idea about this.
This is by design; they've been very quiet about this. It's going to pass, and once it does I doubt it'll only be used for scanning for CSAM
Cant you just make a keyboard app that encrypts it for the recipient while you type it? Will they even ban that?
Like this one https://github.com/amnesica/KryptEY?
Yes, like that, thanks for it. was thinking about something that captures the screen and uses OCR to take the encrypted text and then decrypts it. But that would be complicated and would need to be adapted for every app
There are logistical problems with that. Such as how you plan to get the key out to recipients.
When someone wants to start a conversation they send their public key unencrypted (no need for it to be encrypted) and then you send your public key It will be one more message but the keyboard could have some sort of "profiles" for every persons public key, that you could select (This is just an idea, I have no coding experience)
Okay, but how do you then make sure that key isn't intercepted? Anyone who has the key can read your messages
load more comments
(3 replies)
No they won't. The bill is against social media companies, not your own encryption measures. Where the line exactly falls between hand-coding your own cypher; using good old PGP; using an app to encrypt but sending via a separate service; using an e2ee messaging app+service; being on a community/group-focused e2ee service; normal unencrypted-on-server social media... Going by the Reuters article (I haven't read the actual bill) it seems mostly aimed at main social media platforms, with a to-be-explored relationship with private messages.
After Brexit there's Digital Brexit
This is openly misleading. This sucks, sure, but it doesn't ban e2ee as the title suggests.
load more comments
(9 replies)