this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
13 points (84.2% liked)

Canada

7200 readers
556 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

sounds good to me.

Conservatives will oppose it because they live in a fantasy world view fed to them by people working for oil companies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not an issue for me. 17 cents more in 2030? I'm sure the greedy corps would have pushed the fuel price by a lot more in 7 year's time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

17 cents? That's just normal price hike in the last 6 month.

It'll go down 4 cents then up 10 cents, rinse and repeat every 2 weeks πŸ˜“

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

And that's just what the Parliamentary Budget Office predicted. The article also has another prediction:

"There's a zero per cent chance it would be worse than what the Parliamentary Budget Office is saying," said Wolinetz, who predicts a cost impact of under 10 cents a litre by 2030.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Good. Some people will try to phrase this as a bad thing because yes, you will pay more (eventually, anyway -- article says they don't expect "any real bite until around 2025"). But we should be paying more given the environmental damage that burning this fuel causes. We should not be effectively subsidizing oil companies by paying the cost of their negative externalities.

If anything, I think there should be even more than this. We should have Norway style taxation on fuel. They have a massive savings fund that massively dwarfs our own closest equivalent.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

More incentive for people to look at hybrids or electric for their next car.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Why put such a shitty spin on it? We're developing clean fuel tech -- focus on that, mention the increase in costs, and spin it as a way to accelerate the transition to electric mobility.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'll just ride my bike more. I'm easily saving $2-6 per errand by using a bike instead of a car.